Carter Hart deserves to keep dominating in the NHL

The outrage mob has gotten out of hand with goaltender Carter Hart. Hart doesn’t deserve jail or prison because it’s “morally right” to side with the victim.

I see a lot of hockey fans saying Carter Hart should be in prison.

That’s where this conversation stops being about hockey and turns into something far more dangerous. Once people start demanding jail time after an acquittal, they’re wishing for punishment without verifiable proof, and letting public disgust do what the State didn’t do in court.

The case ended in acquittal

Carter Hart was one of five former 2018 Canadian World Junior players charged in connection with an alleged sexual assault in London, Ontario. In July 2025, all five were found not guilty. The judge ruled that the Crown had not proven the charges beyond a reasonable doubt, and reports on the verdict noted that the judge found serious problems with the complainant’s credibility and reliability. The Crown later chose not to appeal.

That doesn’t mean everyone has to like Hart, or that the whole situation’s wholesome because a judge rendered a verdict. People are free to think the conduct described during the trial was ugly, reckless, degrading, immoral, or representative of a deeper sickness in hockey culture. Fine. Make that argument.

But the second someone says he should be in prison anyway? That person’s arguing against due process and that’s a very, very dangerous slope.

👉 Catch fiction where characters don’t hide behind a screen and complain

Not guilty isn’t a popularity contest

This is the part people forget whenever the accused person’s unpopular: A criminal trial doesn’t answer, “Does this situation make me angry?” It’s supposed to answer whether the State proved a specific criminal charge under a specific legal standard. That standard exists because the State isn’t a moral referee floating above society. It has cages, advanced weaponry, prosecutors, enforcers, and it exists through violent coercion.

That kind of power should terrify anyone with even a halfway functioning sense of liberty.

If the State wants to take years of a man’s life, lock him in a cell, brand him a criminal, and permanently alter the course of his existence, then it better prove a plaintiff’s case beyond a reasonable doubt, not anything based on social media outrage, Reddit speculation, or the superficial, “I read a thread on X and made up my mind.”

If that burden bothers you, then your problem’s with the entire premise of a free society. Not Carter Hart.

Fans can reject Carter Hart without demanding prison

There’s a massive difference between saying, “I don’t want Carter Hart on my team or in the league,” and saying, “Carter Hart should be in jail.”

The first one’s fair game. Fans can boo, stop buying tickets, refuse to buy jerseys, criticize the Vegas Golden Knights for signing him, and say the NHL should have higher standards than “not criminally convicted.” Hell, they’re consciously making the choice to spend money on and keep supporting the NHL — all while bitching behind a screen about how much “Hart sickens them.”

Hart joined Vegas after the acquittal and returned to NHL action in December 2025, which reignited the public debate around his place in the league. That’s a way of people using their own money, attention, and voices to reward or reject what they want in the culture.

But prison’s different. Prison is the State putting a human being in a cage. If you want that after an acquittal, you’re no longer asking for accountability. You want the mob to overrule the verdict because it didn’t emotionally satisfy you. That’s a dangerous door to open, and it’s one of those “be careful what you wish for” moments.

The NHL can have standards, but the State needs proof

Gary Bettman isn’t a judge, despite what the Department of Player Safety might like to pretend on random Tuesday afternoons.

The NHL and its teams call the shots, but only when the fans (the consumer market) decide that they want to support the league and its teams. Sponsors can choose if a player’s worth the controversy — especially if the fans keep tuning in and buying merchandise.

Those are separate from criminal guilt, and where a lot of people blur the lines on purpose. They know Hart was acquitted, so they retreat into the language of “accountability.” But then the verbal demand becomes imprisonment, banishment, permanent professional exile, or some vague punishment that never ends because nothing will ever be enough.

That’s a ritual, and rituals aren’t justice. What’s more? There’s a massive difference between verbal demand and action demand. Fans may be bitching about Hart dominating in the NHL Playoffs. But their actions speak louder than words — they’re still tuning in, attending games, buying merch., and helping the league make record profits.

Imagine if the same fans bitching behind a screen just swore off the NHL. That would at least send a signal that they’re not tuning in unless the league does something with Hart. But guess what? It ain’t the case.

👉 Check out a backlist of books where female protagonists would stick it to male attackers

Due process matters most when the accusation’s ugly

Due process is easy to defend when the accused person is sympathetic. It’s even easier with minor charges, clean facts, and no emotionally-invested crowd. The real test comes when the allegation is revolting, the public’s pissed, and people start acting like the presumption of innocence is a loophole invented for villains.

That’s when due process matters most. The entire point of the presumption of innocence is that the accused doesn’t have to prove he deserves basic rights. The State and/or the accuser must prove he forfeited them through criminal conduct. If the either fails, then the answer’s not to let the crowd finish the job.

You can believe sexual assault is evil and still understand acquitted people shouldn’t be imprisoned. Ditto for hockey culture. Feel free to say it has serious problems and still believe criminal punishment requires proof. Those positions are the bare minimum requirements of moral sanity.

The mob never stops at one person

Here’s the part people won’t want to think about. Once you accept the idea that the State should punish someone without irrefutable evidence, you’ve created a principle that won’t stay confined to Carter Hart. When you open Pandora’s Box, the State will leverage that punishment everywhere.

They will punish political enemies, dissidents, and against people accused of whatever the culture decides is unforgivable next. And at the drop of a hat, it can target you next. That’s how liberty dies in real time — not with tanks in the streets. It dies because enough people decide one hated person doesn’t deserve “innocent until proven guilty.”

Carter Hart deserves to dominate

Nobody has to cheer for Carter Hart, buy his jersey, pretend the case never happened, or even treat his return to the NHL as some grand redemption arc. Hell, you can actively boycott the league, but you choose not to.

Know what signal the NHL is getting? The fans will keep tuning in to watch Carter Hart in the NHL Playoffs. And if they’re making money on it, then you’re basically saying that Hart deserves to keep dominating just like I am — albeit for different reasons.

This should be your takeaway: If you don’t like it, then stop supporting it and spend your money and time elsewhere. 

Nobody’s forcing you to tune into watching 40 grown men skating around a sheet of ice while chasing a flat ball. So, if you don’t want Hart in the league and if you don’t think he should be dominating in the playoffs, then put a chokehold on the NHL’s ratings and revenue.

That’s how the market sends a signal — all while keeping the State from wreaking havoc on people who aren’t proven guilty beyond the shadow of the slightest doubt. Until then, Hart is innocent, he deserves to be part of the Golden Knights, he deserves to be part of the NHL, and he deserves to play dominant hockey.

Catch a backlist of books dedicated to demonstrating principles of liberty through fiction