Libertarianism isn’t utopian—it rejects naive perfection
Critics call libertarianism utopian. But it’s statism, not liberty, that depends on irrational trust in elites to fix a flawed world.
“Libertarianism is utopian.” It’s one of the most repeated, but least thought-out, attacks on liberty. The claim goes like this: Without government control, society would spiral into chaos, because people can’t be trusted to act rationally or ethically. Therefore, we need centralized power to keep everything in order.
But here’s the irony: Libertarianism don’t assume people are perfect. Statism does.
Let’s break that down.
Libertarianism accepts human imperfection
Libertarianism begins with a simple truth: People are flawed. They lie, cheat, steal, manipulate, and pursue power. That’s why libertarians argue against concentrating power in a central authority because the wrong people will always try to control it. And if you need any evidence, just look at America’s failed foreign policy.
We don’t trust politicians, bureaucrats, or majority rule to magically rise above human nature. That’s why our principles are built around limiting coercion, decentralizing decision-making, and defending individual rights. We assume failure. That’s why we distribute power instead of hoarding it.
In other words, libertarianism grounds itself in realism.
Statism is the real utopia
Now flip the lens. What does the average statist actually believe?
They believe that if we just elect the right leaders, pass the right laws, create the right programs, and give bureaucrats the right authority… society will improve. Nearly 37 trillion dollars later, the polygraph confirmed that was a lie.
That’s utopia, faith-based politics, and assuming a select group of flawed humans can be trusted with a monopoly on violence—and will use it wisely, compassionately, and fairly. Yeah, just ask those living in the Middle East how well that’s going for them. Especially as I write this.
Let’s be honest: What’s more naive?
-
A system that limits power because humans are fallible, or,
-
A system that gives massive power to elites and just hopes they use it responsibly?
Historical reality proves the point
Every utopian system has failed because it trusted planners and rulers to do what’s best for everyone. Whether it’s the USSR, Maoist China, or modern technocracies that claim to “follow the science,” the results are always the same: Central planning breaks, people suffer, and freedom disappears.
Meanwhile, the most prosperous societies in history emerged when people were left free to trade, think, innovate, and organize voluntarily.
Libertarianism don’t assume everyone will behave. It assumes they won’t, and it builds a system that prevents one group from ruling over everyone else when they don’t.
The bottom line, “because TC said so”
Libertarianism ain’t utopian. It’s defensive. It says, don’t give anyone power you wouldn’t trust your worst enemy to wield. That’s not fantasy. It’s just wisdom earned from history, pain, and human nature.
So next time someone calls libertarianism utopian, flip the script: “No, friend. You’re the one dreaming.”
Want to know what a free and imperfect society might look like? My Arcane Elemental Academy series is set in one. While it tells the tale of a young girl learning how to hone her elemental magic, there’s an underlying theme to the work. And yeah, there’s a reason the setting’s opponents call it AnaCapland.
You can get to know Yote Diamondback and her journey by downloading the free prequel below.
