Stop confusing free market capitalism with destructive mercantilism

Free market capitalism is not a destructive economic system designed to make the rich richer and the poor poorer. That’s capitalism’s evil cousin: mercantilism.

Mercantilism’s greatest trick was leading the masses to believe it was one and the same with capitalism. When people rage against “capitalism,” what are they usually pointing at?

• Corporations getting bailed out
• Big players crushing smaller competitors
• Politicians and businesses working hand-in-hand
• Entire industries locked behind regulations and licenses

That’s what modern-day mercantilism looks like, and it’s a far cry from capitalism. It’s a system where success gets secured through protection, access, and control. This is also how big pharma, the military-industrial complex, prison-industrial complex, and even Big Tech thrive.

👉 Catch my entire backlist at The Rebel Lore Vault that ain’t kind to mercantilism

Capitalism vs. mercantilism

Let’s strip this down so there’s no confusion:

Free market capitalism:

• Invest capital, then profit by solving problems people willingly pay you to solve
• Competition in an open market
• Failure comes as easily as success
• No one gets forced to buy from you

Mercantilism:

• Profit from gaining political favor
• Lobby for protection from competition
• Rely on regulations to keep others out
• The system tilts in your favor

One system rewards value creation. The other rewards control over the system itself.

Why people confuse the two

Mercantilism wears capitalism like a mask. It uses the language of markets, the appearance of private enterprise, and the illusion of competition. This overlaps with capitalism, which is why I call it “capitalism’s evil cousin.”

Underneath, it’s a closed loop between power and privilege. Once that loop forms, people don’t see “state-backed privilege.” They see “capitalism.”

Why? Because they’ve been conditioned to see and call this nonsense “capitalism.” Many times, it happens in government schools. And if it doesn’t, it surely happens at the university level.

The real danger of that confusion

Here’s where it gets costly: When people misidentify the problem, they reach for the wrong solution.

They claim:

• “Capitalism is broken”
• “We need more control”
• “We need the State to step in and fix this”

But the mercantilist system they’re reacting to is already built on State intervention. So when the State gladly steps in to “fix the problem,” it feeds it. More control doesn’t eliminate mercantilism. It expands it, then when something else fails, those in control point the finger at capitalism.

👉 Get my backlist of books and meet interventionist-loving villains

This is where socialism and communism sneak in

Once capitalism gets blamed for mercantilist outcomes, the next step feels logical:

“If markets cause this, we need to replace it.”

That’s the fatal trap, because now you’re moving from a distorted system with too much centralized influence to a system that requires total centralized control to function. And that’s where things get worse, not better.

The difference comes down to one thing

In every system, you have to answer a simple question: How do people succeed?

With capitalism, success hinges on creating value for others. Shift gears to mercantilism, and you control access, rules, or protection if you want success. In centralized systems like socialism, you align yourself with those who own the means of production to succeed.

These different paths collide with one haunting reality: Incentives shape behavior. As you can see from the above paragraph, only one system creates incentives for an honest means of living: capitalism.

Why this matters (especially if you’re on the fence)

You don’t need to be an anarcho-capitalist to see the issue. You just need to recognize a few noble truths.

If the system rewards connections over competence, it’s not a free market. Ditto for when public policy stifles competition. Finally, if outcomes depend on political access, it’s not voluntary exchange.

And if you try to fix those problems by centralizing more power, you’re not escaping the problem. You’re scaling it, and adding fuel to mercantilism’s fire.

This isn’t theoretical

This is exactly why systems that start with supposedly good intentions end up concentrating power, limiting opportunity, and forcing compliance when things don’t work. Worse yet, when things “don’t work,” the general thought process is “we don’t have enough economic intervention.”

This article is a reset. Before you can even begin debating capitalism vs. socialism or anarcho-capitalism vs. pure communism, you need to get one thing straight: The system most people are angry at isn’t capitalism, but mercantilism wearing its skin.

Until that distinction clicks, every argument built on top of it stands on eggshells.

My story of free market capitalism vs. evil mercantilism

If you want to see what a system built on self-ownership and voluntary exchange actually looks like in practice, step into my young adult academy fantasy The Arcane Prophecy.

Arcane doesn’t allegorize capitalism vs. socialism or capitalism vs. communism. No, I took it a step further and pitted capitalism vs. mercantilism. Something that’s crazy underutilized in fiction.

It’s about time we start learning how beneficial capitalism is and how destructive, how evil, and how much of a cancer mercantilism is. And how it loves blaming capitalism while it wreaks havoc with big pharma, the military-industrial complex, and how it even trickles down to deep pockets in small-town America.

👉 Check out The Arcane Prophecy now and call out mercantilism